Same-Sex Relationships in the Bible
You shall not lie with a man, as with a woman. That is detestable.Leviticus 18:22 · World English Bible
Original Language & Text
Leviticus 18:22 and 20:13 use the phrase 'mishkav zachar' (literally 'lying down of/with a male'), a construction whose scope — whether it targets all male-male intercourse or specifically cultic, coercive, or culturally marked practices — is debated given limited comparative usage. In 1 Corinthians 6:9 and 1 Timothy 1:10, Paul pairs 'malakoi' (literally 'soft ones,' likely referring to passive partners in male same-sex acts, though possibly broader effeminacy) with 'arsenokoitai,' a term Paul appears to have coined by combining the Septuagint's 'arsenos' (male) and 'koiten' (bed) from Leviticus 18:22/20:13 (LXX), making it the earliest known occurrence of the word in Greek literature. Because it is rare and largely dependent on later, ambiguous usage, scholars disagree on its precise referent — general male same-sex intercourse, exploitative/pederastic relations, or male prostitution. Romans 1:26-27 uses 'physis' (nature) language and describes both female and male same-sex acts as 'para physin' (against/beyond nature), a phrase also used elsewhere in Greco-Roman literature with varying moral connotations.
History & Authorship
Ancient Mediterranean cultures recognized same-sex acts primarily within structures like pederasty, slavery, and status hierarchies (an adult free male penetrating a social inferior), a framework notably different from the modern concept of sexual orientation as an identity between consenting adult equals, a concept that did not exist in antiquity. This has fueled scholarly debate over how directly ancient texts address modern committed same-sex relationships. Historically, virtually all branches of Judaism and Christianity condemned same-sex acts until the mid-to-late 20th century, when historical-critical scholarship, gay rights movements, and revisionist theology prompted some denominations to reassess. Since the 1960s-70s, mainline Protestant bodies (parts of the Episcopal Church, ELCA, United Church of Christ, Presbyterian Church USA, Reform and Conservative Judaism) have moved toward affirming same-sex relationships and clergy, often citing evolving understanding of love, covenant, and justice, while evangelical, Catholic, Orthodox, and Orthodox Jewish communities have largely retained the traditional prohibition, producing significant denominational splits (e.g., United Methodist Church's 2022-2024 divisions).
The Popular / Mainstream View
Globally and across most historic Christian traditions (Catholic, Orthodox, most evangelical Protestant bodies) and Orthodox Judaism, the traditional and still-majority position holds that scripture consistently prohibits same-sex sexual activity while affirming the inherent dignity of persons with same-sex attraction, calling for celibacy or opposite-sex marriage as the framework for sexual expression. This view treats Leviticus, Romans 1, and the Pauline vice lists as forming a coherent, trans-cultural prohibition rooted in a creation-based theology of marriage (Genesis 2:24, reaffirmed in Matthew 19:4-6).
Minority & Alternative Views
Revisionist/affirming reading
Held by a significant and growing minority of mainline Protestant denominations, Reform and Reconstructionist Judaism, and some evangelicals, this view argues the biblical texts address exploitative, idolatrous, or pederastic practices specific to their ancient context rather than modern loving, committed same-sex unions, and that broader biblical themes of love, inclusion, and covenant faithfulness support affirming such relationships and same-sex marriage.
Side B / celibate-orientation view
A minority position within conservative Christianity holding that same-sex attraction itself is not sinful but that same-sex sexual activity remains prohibited, calling gay and lesbian Christians to celibacy or non-sexual covenant friendship rather than either marriage or an affirming ethic; associated with writers like Wesley Hill and organizations like Revoice.
Traditionalist condemnation of orientation and act alike
A more restrictive minority view, found in some conservative circles, that treats same-sex attraction itself (not only acts) as inherently disordered and a matter requiring repentance or change, sometimes historically associated with 'conversion therapy' approaches now widely repudiated even by many traditionalist denominations and mental health bodies.
What Scholars Say
Linguists agree 'arsenokoitai' is a rare, likely Pauline-coined compound drawing on the Levitical prohibitions, but its precise scope — all male same-sex intercourse versus specifically exploitative forms — cannot be settled by word study alone since so few contemporaneous examples survive; later usage in ecclesiastical Greek suggests broader application. Historians of sexuality (following work associated with Michel Foucault and classicists like Kenneth Dover) broadly agree the ancient world lacked a concept of sexual orientation as a fixed identity, which is a genuinely established historical point, though scholars disagree sharply on how much this should change the theological application of the texts today. Whether the biblical authors intended a categorical prohibition of all same-sex acts or addressed only specific abusive/cultic forms remains a contested, unresolved question rather than one modern scholarship has definitively answered either way.
Sources & Further Reading
- Robert Gagnon, The Bible and Homosexual Practice
- James Brownson, Bible, Gender, Sexuality
- Kenneth Dover, Greek Homosexuality
- William Loader's multi-volume studies on sexuality in early Judaism and Christianity
- Wesley Hill, Washed and Waiting
Dig Deeper
Have a more specific question about Same-Sex Relationships in the Bible? Ask it below — Berea will look into it live and note where views differ, the same way it does everywhere else.
Answers here are generated live by AI and are not independently vetted.