Isaiah 7:14: "Virgin" or "Young Woman"?
Therefore the Lord himself will give you a sign. Behold, the virgin will conceive, and bear a son, and shall call his name Immanuel.Isaiah 7:14 · World English Bible
Original Language & Text
The Hebrew word at the center of this debate is 'almah,' which means a young woman old enough to marry. It usually carries a sense of youth, and often (though not by definition) implies she is a virgin. Hebrew has a different, more specific word for 'virgin,' 'betulah,' which Isaiah does not use here. When the ancient Greek Old Testament (the Septuagint) translated 'almah' as 'parthenos,' a Greek word that usually does specifically mean 'virgin,' it set up the reading that Matthew 1:23 later builds on directly, quoting that Greek wording to present Jesus's birth as a fulfillment of the prophecy. Whether the Greek translators originally meant 'parthenos' in its full sense of 'virgin,' or used it more loosely to mean simply 'young woman' (which the word can occasionally mean), is debated. This gap between 'almah' (young woman, virginity implied but not stated outright) and the later 'virgin' reading is at the heart of the whole controversy.
Key Terms in the Original Language
“young woman of marriageable age” (Isa. 7:14)
This is the word actually used in the Hebrew text; it does not specify virginity.
the more specific Hebrew word for “virgin”
Isaiah had this more precise word available and did not use it here, a key piece of evidence critical scholars cite against reading Isaiah 7:14 as originally predicting a literal virgin birth — though the Greek Septuagint's translators nonetheless rendered almah as parthenos (“virgin”), the reading Matthew 1:23 follows.
History & Authorship
Isaiah first spoke these words to King Ahaz of Judah, around 734-732 BCE, during a political and military crisis when two enemy kings were threatening Judah. The sign was that before a soon-to-be-born child grew old enough to know right from wrong, those threatening kings would be defeated, a sign meant for people living at that time. Jewish tradition has generally identified this child as either Isaiah's own son or the future king Hezekiah. Ancient Jewish interpretation read 'almah' simply as 'young woman,' referring to someone alive in the 700s BCE. Early Christian interpretation, following the Greek translation's word 'parthenos' and Matthew's Gospel, read the verse instead as a prophecy of a miraculous virgin birth, fulfilled centuries later in Jesus. This reading became central to Christian belief about Christ from the earliest centuries. When Jerome translated the Bible into Latin, he used the word 'virgo' (virgin), which cemented this reading throughout Western Christianity. The debate came back into public view in 1952, when the Revised Standard Version translated 'almah' as 'young woman' instead of 'virgin,' sparking backlash from conservative Christians and renewed debate over translation choices versus theological tradition.
How This Debate Developed
-
3rd–2nd c. BC
Septuagint renders almah as parthenos
The Greek translation chooses “virgin,” the word Matthew 1:23 later quotes.
-
late 1st c.
Matthew applies the verse to Jesus
Matthew 1:23 cites Isaiah 7:14 via the Septuagint's “virgin” wording as fulfilled in the virgin birth.
-
1952
RSV controversy
The Revised Standard Version's choice of “young woman” over “virgin” provokes public backlash, including reports of Bibles being burned by some conservative critics.
The Popular / Mainstream View
Most conservative and evangelical Christian traditions, along with the Catholic Church and Eastern Orthodoxy, believe Isaiah 7:14 is a genuine prophecy of Jesus's virgin birth. They point to Matthew's inspired use of the Greek word 'parthenos' as confirming that 'almah' carries the meaning of 'virgin' in this verse. Some in this camp see the prophecy as having two layers: a smaller fulfillment in Isaiah's own time, and a fuller, ultimate fulfillment in Christ.
Minority & Alternative Views
Jewish contextual reading
The standard Jewish interpretation, found in both classical and modern Jewish commentary, holds that 'almah' simply means a young woman old enough to have children, without virginity being its main point. This view holds that the prophecy was fulfilled in Isaiah's own time, usually identified with the birth of Hezekiah or a child of the prophet, not with a miraculous virgin birth centuries later.
Critical/historical-critical reading
Many mainline Protestant and academic biblical scholars read the verse strictly within its original 8th-century BCE setting, as a near-term sign given to Ahaz. They see Matthew's use of the verse as an early Christian reapplication of an existing text to a new situation, similar to how ancient Jewish teachers sometimes reapplied older texts, rather than as uncovering Isaiah's own original intended meaning.
Double-fulfillment view
A middle-ground view, common among some evangelical scholars, holds that Isaiah 7:14 had a real, limited fulfillment in the 700s BCE, while also serving as a foreshadowing that was later fulfilled more fully and miraculously in Christ's birth. This allows both the original Hebrew context and Matthew's Christian reading to stand together without contradiction.
What Scholars Say
It's well established among language experts, across religious and secular scholarship alike, that 'almah' does not specifically or only mean 'virgin' (that's the job of the word 'betulah'), and that its core meaning is 'young woman of marriageable age.' It's also well established that the Greek translators rendered it as 'parthenos,' and that Matthew's Gospel draws directly on that Greek wording. What remains genuinely disputed, and cannot be settled by word studies alone, is a theological question: whether the Greek translation and Matthew's use of it represent a legitimate, fuller understanding of the text revealed later, or a reinterpretation that goes beyond what Isaiah originally meant. This is a question about how to interpret scripture and what counts as scripture's true meaning, not something language study alone can decide.
Sources & Further Reading
- Brown-Driver-Briggs Hebrew Lexicon on 'almah' and 'betulah'
- Joseph Blenkinsopp, Isaiah 1-39 (Anchor Bible)
- John Walton and others on Isaianic near/far fulfillment
- Septuagint (LXX) Isaiah and Jerome's Vulgate
- Revised Standard Version translation committee notes (1952)
Find More Books on This
Search Google Books' full catalog — print and ebook alike — for more on Isaiah 7:14: "Virgin" or "Young Woman"?, beyond Berea's curated source list above.
Search Google Scholar Directly
Dig Deeper checks curated, cross-verified databases and favors survey articles. Find More Books searches Google's book catalog only. Google Scholar itself casts the widest net of all — journal articles, dissertations, and more — but with no curation, so expect to do your own filtering among the results.
Advanced Academic Search
Run a filtered, student-controlled query straight against Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, and Crossref — by keyword, author, and year range, with an open-access-only option — and no AI in the loop.
Search Academic Databases for “Isaiah 7:14: "Virgin" or "Young Woman"?” ↗Study & Discussion Questions
- What is the semantic difference between the Hebrew words "almah" and "betulah," and how much weight can the word "almah" alone bear in the virgin-birth debate?
- How does the Septuagint's Greek translation of "almah" as "parthenos" (virgin) shape the New Testament's use of this verse in Matthew 1:23, and how do Jewish readers interpret the original Hebrew differently?
- What is a "near/far" or double-fulfillment reading of Isaiah 7:14, and how does it attempt to hold together the verse's original 8th-century BCE context and its later Christian application?
- If "almah" more plausibly means "young woman" without specifying virginity, what does that do — or not do — to the Christian doctrine of the virgin birth, which also rests on Matthew's and Luke's narrative claims?
Dig Deeper
Have a more specific question about Isaiah 7:14: "Virgin" or "Young Woman"?? Ask it below — Berea will look into it live and note where views differ, the same way it does everywhere else.
Answers here are generated live by AI and are not independently vetted.